Volume 42 Issue 2
Apr.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Changjun, ZHENG Chenhao, DAI Jingchen, LI Ruimin. A Review of Physical Infrastructure Design Methods for Dedicated Lane for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles on Highway[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(2): 1-11. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.02.001
Citation: YANG Changjun, ZHENG Chenhao, DAI Jingchen, LI Ruimin. A Review of Physical Infrastructure Design Methods for Dedicated Lane for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles on Highway[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(2): 1-11. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.02.001

A Review of Physical Infrastructure Design Methods for Dedicated Lane for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles on Highway

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.02.001
  • Received Date: 2023-06-21
    Available Online: 2024-09-14
  • To thoroughly explore the impacts of the physical infrastructure design of dedicated lanes (DL) for Connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) on traffic performances, this paper systematically sorted out the ongoing progress in three domains, namely, DL deployment conditions, DL access types, and separation types between DL and general-purpose lanes. It clarifies the theoretical foundations and practical advancements of existing research, constructing a framework that outlines the relationship between physical infrastructure and traffic system performance, and such endeavor has shed light on the research gaps and future direction in this regard. The results indicate that current studies on DL deployment conditions primarily focus on traffic efficiency, while assessments of traffic safety are relatively lacking. Divergent conclusions in existing research stem from different assumptions, thus demanding more precise evaluations of DL deployment conditions in future research. Concerning the access types, both limited access and continuous access have their advantages, yet the embodiment conditions of such advantages require further validation. The design of high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane access types can also be used for re-evaluation in the scenario of DL. It is essential to ascertain how the separation methods between DL and regular lanes affect the adaptability of human drivers, ensuring their effective adjustment to DL deployment. In general, although some progress has been made in current research, the lack of real-world cases and actual deployment effect verification means that simulation-based methods often yield varying conclusions due to differences in assumptions and other factors. Future research should focus on accurately describing CAV behavior, conducting longitudinal and cross-sectional comparison studies, and quantifying the impact of DL design on safety and efficiency to make improvements.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    RAZMI RAD S, FARAH H, TAALE H, et al. Design and operation of dedicated lanes for connected and automated vehicles on motorways: a conceptual framework and research agenda[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 117.
    [2]
    LYTRIVIS P, MANGANIARIS S, PAGLE K, et al. Inframix plan for systems interaction, integration and testing[R]. Vienna: INFRAMIX, 2019.
    [3]
    JOHNSON C. Readiness of the road Network[R]. London: Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring, 2017.
    [4]
    GHANIPOOR S. Safety impact evaluation of a narrow automated vehicle-exclusive reversible lane on an existing smart freeway[R]. Virginia: Safe-D National UTC, 2021.
    [5]
    OAKES L, TRICKER J, DAWN A, et al. Roads for the futurededicated driverless spaces[R]. Exeter: City Science, 2018.
    [6]
    ZHU H, ZHU X, XU Z, et al. An experimental method for cav dedicated lane setting strategy[C], 2020: 59-66.
    [7]
    BLYTHE P, BOX S, HOOSE N, et al. Research on the impacts of connected and autonomous vehicles(cavs)on traffic flow, stage 1: evidence review[R]. Montreal: Atkins L, 2016.
    [8]
    李克强, 李家文, 常雪阳, 等. 智能网联汽车云控系统原理及其典型应用[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(3): 261-275.

    LI K Q, Li J W, CHANG X Y, et al. Principles and typical applications of cloud control system for intelligient and connected vehicles[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety And Engergy, 2020, 11(3): 261-275. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    LAMB M. Vehicle automation and highway infrastructure: driving positive change[J]. Highways, 2015, 84(2): 47-47.
    [10]
    CATAPULT T S. Future proofing infrastructure for connected and automated vehicles[R]. Milton Keynes: Transport Systems Catapult, 2017.
    [11]
    COLES C. Automated vehicles: a guide for planners and policymakers[D]. San Luis Obispo: California Polytechnic State University, 2016.
    [12]
    FARAH H, ERKENS S M, ALKIM T, et al. Infrastructure for automated and connected driving: state of the art and future research directions. In: Road Vehicle Automation 4[M]. Cham: Springer, 2018.
    [13]
    MA K, WANG H. Influence of exclusive lanes for connected and autonomous vehicles on freeway traffic flow[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 50168-50178. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2910833
    [14]
    LANHANG Y, TOSHIYUKI Y. Impact of dedicated lanes for connected and autonomous vehicle on traffic flow throughput[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2018, 512, 15: 588-579.
    [15]
    ZHONG Z. Assessing the effectiveness of managed lane strategies for the rapid deployment of cooperative adaptive cruise control technology[D]. Newark: New Jersey Institute of Technology, 2018.
    [16]
    LI J. Impact of exclusive lanes for autonomous vehicles: a cost-benefit analysis of exclusive av lanes in eastern China[D]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2021.
    [17]
    VANDER LAAN Z, SADABADI K F. Operational performance of a congested corridor with lanes dedicated to autonomous vehicle traffic[J]. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2017, 6(1): 42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.05.006
    [18]
    ZHANG J, WU K, CHENG M, et al. Safety evaluation for connected and autonomous vehicles' exclusive lanes considering penetrate ratios and impact of trucks using surrogate safety measures[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020(2): 1-16.
    [19]
    RAHMAN M S, ABDEL-ATY M. Longitudinal safety evaluation of connected vehicles' platooning on expressways[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2018, 117: 381-391. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.012
    [20]
    HAMILTON B A, TECHNOLOGY N. Dedicating lanes for priority or exclusive use by connected and automated vehicles[M]. Washington, D.C. : The National Academies Press, 2018.
    [21]
    GHANIPOOR MACHIANI S, SOHRABI A, JAHANGIRI A. Impact of regular and narrow AV-exclusive lanes on manual driver behavior[R]. San Jose: Mineta Transportation Institute, 2020.
    [22]
    YANG D, FARAH H, SCHOENMAKERS M J, et al. Human drivers behavioural adaptation when driving next to a platoon of automated vehicles on a dedicated lane and implications on ttraffic flow[C]. 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., United States: National Academies of USA, 2019.
    [23]
    NICKKAR A, LEE Y J. Evaluation of dedicated lanes for automated vehicles at roundabouts with various flow patterns[C]. 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., United States: National Academies of USA, 2019.
    [24]
    CASSIDY M J, KIM K, NI W, et al. A problem of limited-access special lanes. part i: spatiotemporal studies of real freeway traffic[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 80: 307-319. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.07.001
    [25]
    CASSIDY M J, KIM K, NI W, et al. A problem of limited-access special lanes. part ii: exploring remedies via simulation[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 80: 320-329. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.07.003
    [26]
    VAN BEINUM A, BROEKMAN E, FARAH H, et al. Critical assessment of microscopic simulation models for simulating turbulence around motorway ramps[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 2020, 146(2): 04019066. doi: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000296
    [27]
    HA P, CHEN S, DONG J, et al. Leveraging the capabilities of connected and autonomous vehicles and multi-agent reinforcement learning to mitigate highway bottleneck congestion[P/OL]. (2020-10-12)[2023-04-12]. http://arXivpreprintarXiv:2010.05436,2020.
    [28]
    RAN B, LEIGHT S, CHANG B. A microscopic simulation model for merging control on a dedicated-lane automated highway system[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 1999, 7: 369-388. doi: 10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00028-5
    [29]
    KITAEJANG, CASSIDY M J. Dual influences on vehicle speed in special-use lanes and critique of us regulation[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2012, 46(7): 1108-1123. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.01.008
    [30]
    JANG K, OUM S, CHAN C Y. Traffic characteristics of high-occupancy vehicle facilities[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012, 2278(1): 180-193. doi: 10.3141/2278-20
    [31]
    BORIBOONSOMSIN K, WU G, BARTH M. High occupancy vehicle(HOV)system analysis tools-district 8 HOV facility performance analysis[R], Sacramento, United States: California Department of Transportation Division of Research and Innovation, 2012.
    [32]
    WU G, BORIBOONSOMSIN K, BARTH M, et al. Different types of high-occupancy vehicle access control: comparative analysis of empirical capacities[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015, 2484(1): 149-158. doi: 10.3141/2484-16
    [33]
    SHAN X, HAO P, BORIBOONSOMSIN K, et al. Partially limited access control design for special-use freeway lanes[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018, 118: 25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.09.002
    [34]
    IAN H, MIKE V. Best practices separation devices between toll lanes and free lanes[R]. Austin: Center for Transportation Research at The University of Texas at Austin, 2007.
    [35]
    COONER S C, RANFT S E. Safety evaluation of buffer-separatedhigh-occupancy vehicle lanes in Texas[J]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006, 1959: 168-177. doi: 10.1177/0361198106195900119
    [36]
    SOLOMON D. Accidents on main rural highways related to speed[M]. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1974.
    [37]
    VAN BEINUM A. Turbulence in traffic at motorway ramps and its impact on traffic operations and safety[D]. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Delft Delft University of Technology, 2018.
    [38]
    ELEFTERIADOU L A. The highway capacity manual 6th edition: a guide for multimodal mobility analysis[J]. ITE journal, 2016, 86(4): 14-18.
    [39]
    GOLOB T F, RECKER W W, ALVAREZ V M. Freeway safety as a function of traffic flow[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2004, 36(6): 933-946.
    [40]
    VAN BEINUM A, HOVENGA M, KNOOP V, et al. Macroscopic traffic flow changes around ramps[J]. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 2017, 14(7): 598-614.
    [41]
    JANG K, KANG S, SEO J, et al. Cross-section designs for the safety performance of buffer-separated high-occupancy vehicle lanes[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2013, 139(3): 247-254. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000496
    [42]
    GE J I, OROSZ G. Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback-sciencedirect[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2014, 46 (9): 46-64.
    [43]
    KHAN U, BASARAS P, SCHMIDT-THIEME L, et al. Analyzing cooperative lane change models for connected vehicles[C]. International Conference on Connected Vehicles & Expo(ICCVE), Vienna, Austria: IEEE, 2014.
    [44]
    RAZMI RAD S, FARAH H, TAALE H, et al. The Impact of a dedicated lane for connected and automated vehicles on the behaviour of drivers of manual vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2021, 82: 141-153. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.010
    [45]
    RUDIN-BROWN C, JAMSON S. Behavioural adaptation and road safety: theory, evidence and action[M]. New York: CRC Press, 2013.
    [46]
    RAHMATI Y, HOSSEINI M K, TALEBPOUR A, et al. Influence of autonomous vehicles on car-following behavior of human drivers[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019, 2673(12): 367-379. doi: 10.1177/0361198119862628
    [47]
    GOUY M, WIEDEMANN K, STEVENS A, et al. Driving next to automated vehicle platoons: how do short time headways influence non-platoon drivers'longitudinal control?[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, 27: 264-273. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.003
    [48]
    SCHOENMAKERS M, YANG D, FARAH H. Car-following behavioural adaptation when driving next to automated vehicles on a dedicated lane on motorways: a driving simulator study in the Netherlands[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2021, 78: 119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.01.010
    [49]
    VOGEL K. A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators[J]. Accident analysis & prevention, 2003, 35(3): 427-433.
    [50]
    孙玲, 张静, 周瀛, 等. 车路协同环境下自动驾驶专用车道入口区域设计[J]. 公路交通科技, 2020, 37(S1): 122-129.

    SUN L, ZHANG J, ZHOU Y, et al. Design of entrance area of automatic driving special lane in vehicle-infrastructure collaborative environment[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2020, 37(S1): 122-129. (in Chinese)
    [51]
    徐东彬, 陈昕. 智慧高速公路演进及发展探究[J]. 中国交通信息化, 2022(1): 28-32, 43.

    XU D B, CHEN X. Research on the evolution and development of intelligent highway[J]. China ITS Journal, 2022(1): 28-32, 43. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (161) PDF downloads(31) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return